Comparison
Shipeezi vs spreadsheets
Most import chains still run on a spreadsheet and an inbox. It is flexible, and it is where the chargeback, the audit failure and the re-keyed PO come from.
Where each fits
Category-level, not a scorecard.
A fair read of where each system earns its place. This compares categories, not any specific deployment of either product.
ShipeeziShipper-side execution and compliance
Built forOne record for the whole chain
Core objectPO line, SSCC carton, booking, container, leg
SSCC and labelsMinted with a check digit and tied to the record
ValidationPre-ship checks as rules over the data
NetworkInvite suppliers and forwarders to the same POs
Where it fitsWhen the chain outgrows a shared file
Spreadsheets and emailThe manual status quo
Built forWhatever the person who built it needed
Core objectA row and a column
SSCC and labelsTyped by hand, or pasted
ValidationManual eyeballing, found late
NetworkEmail attachments and version confusion
Where it fitsA first pass, and a small, stable operation
Comparison claims under review. This is a category-level comparison and it is under review. It describes where each approach fits, not the features of any specific tool. Confirm every claim against current practice before this page is used in a tender.
Where Shipeezi fits
Keep the flexibility, lose the re-keying.
A spreadsheet is a fine place to start and a bad place to run a chargeback defence. Shipeezi gives you the same flexibility with one record, pre-ship validation and a trace that survives an audit.
Bring the spreadsheet.
Send us your tracker and we will show the same data as a chain of records with the checks on top.